Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitler's Scientists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Hitler's Scientists

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Hitler's Scientists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Book report which merely summarises content Mccapra (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

• Keep, but completely rewrite (I may get to this if I have time). The book's been reviewed by The Sunday Times, The Guardian, The Independent, Foreign Affairs, Kirkus Reviews, etc., more than satisfying WP:BOOKCRIT. Next time, do some checking WP:BEFORE. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:10, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
• Keep per Clarityfiend. The article could stand cleanup and expansion (e.g., a "reception" section), but that's not the purpose of AfD. XOR'easter (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
• Keep per Clarityfiend. Satisfies GNG and NBOOK with multiple book reviews. James500 (talk) 00:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
• Keep, meets WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG with multiple reviews in reliable publications (thankyou Clarityfiend for listing them), also with WorldCat showing that this book is held by over 1,000 libraries worldwide (1st place i go to when looking for indications of possible notability) it would be surprising if there werent. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Catrìona (talk) 08:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
• Keep per above. –Vami♜_IV♠ 09:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.