Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 April 15

< April 14	April 16 >

April 15

NewEnterprisebridge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. — Edokter • Talk • 11:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewEnterprisebridge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guest9999 (notify | contribs).

The FU rationale is given as "Illustration of the design section where costumes and bridge design is discussed", illustration is not valid under NFCC#8, only understanding is, the image is blurred and conveys little information on either costumes and bridge design, and is questionable if this topic was properly illustrated that it need to understand it would be significant enough to meet NFCC Fasach Nua (talk) 22:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note, I only uploaded the reduced resolution version, you might want to check with an admin to see who uploaded the original - now deleted - version, they might want to comment. Guest9999 (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it shows the bridge which is discussed. Alientraveller (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because significance is already established by critical commentary in the article about the bridge's design. Such a design cannot be conveyed by descriptive text alone because it sets an unrealistic expectation for readers to imagine a science fiction setting that does not exist in anyone's familiar environment. Nominator's stringency is best applied to other non-free images on film articles that were inserted for decorative purposes and not supportive of existing critical commentary in the articles. —Erik (talk • contrib) 22:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep assuming rationale is reworded. Things like the bridge redesign and costumes are valid reasons as subject of critical commentary. There's also a tad about lens flare throughout the film I saw that could be added. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 00:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep...but... This image has enough context and additional sources to warrant inclusion as an appropriate illustration of the paragraph in question. Given the impact of the subject in question within the Star Trek genre, I find this image to be appropriate to keep. That said, if there is another image (especially a free one...I know it is a serious longshot) that better shows the cinematography and set work of this movie, it could certainly be replaced. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Keegan In Miami.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keegan In Miami.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Keeg bob (notify | contribs).

Not used on any articles, and uploaded by a blocked user who was blocked for vandalism. The article it was used in was deleted. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 00:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PhotoStockScreenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator -- IRP ☎ 00:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhotoStockScreenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alx 91 (notify | contribs).

Non-low resolution screenshot of a webpage (1066 by 999 pixels is not low resolution) —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 02:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've resized the picture accordingly. Any other files with this same issue should be tagged with {{Non-free reduce}} instead of being listed for deletion. --fuzzy510 (talk) 21:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I would like to then withdraw my nomination. —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 23:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Voorkant RSC Wikipedia.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wknight94 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voorkant RSC Wikipedia.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RSCMiddelburg (notify | contribs).

Replaceable fair-use file; depicts a currently existing building. fuzzy510 (talk) 02:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless a proper fair use rationale can be derived (another shot of the building could be taken, but if this is the logo of an organization, then it couldn't be recreated). Clarification from the original uploader would be useful, but doesn't seem to be forthcoming. No choice but to delete otherwise. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pinochet portrait bw1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinochet portrait bw1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bukharin (notify | contribs).

Replaceable non-free image. Commons has free images. Therefore, the image falls under WP:CSD#F7. The uploader did not agree, and it was asked to be brought here after multiple re-uploads. hmwith τ 03:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I contest the deletion of the image under claims of WP:CSD#F7 both in form and substance. Disclaimer: i am the uploader.

In form: The file was speedy deleted two times, as it under WP:CSD#F7.1, but the deleting administrator is claiming that the deletion was motivated by WP:CSD#F7.2. The procedure for both causes differ, and User:hmwith resorted to the procedure specified for number 1 (inmediate deletion without notification) when he should have used the procedure established for number 2 (namely, tagging and notification for two days before deletion). I am the uploader and was not notified any of the times. I am not claiming that this was done in bad faith, as I understand that it is the nominator the one that should have notified me, but since there is a procedural vice in the previous deletions, i ask that this two previous deletions be not taken into consideration before making a decision on this nomination.

In substance: I dispute the claim that the file falls under WP:CSD#F7.1 (which was cited as the original reason for deletion), as the fair use rationale is not invalid per se: Chilean Law specifies that images of state officials in the exercise of their functions are free for use in educational contexts, even when the holder of property rigths over the image does not loose his rights in other contexts. Hence, even though the image does not enter the public domain (and is then in need of a fair use rationale) the use of the image in the context of WP is free, e.g. not requiring authorization. If attribution is needed is debatable (IANAL) but since the author is unknown to me (and i have exhausted the measures to identify him) this is not relevant.

I also dispute the more relevant question of whether the image is replaceable by a free alternative. Pinochet is, was, and always will be a military figure in the history of Chile. Presenting a photo of him in civilian suit is misleading, inconsistent with wikipedia use in other articles of similar figures, and plain wrong. He always wore military uniforms, even in his role as president of the republic. His official presidential portrait showed him in military uniform, his supporters usually prefer photos with military uniforms (see the galleries at www.fudacionpinochet.cl), etcetera. This leaves only one free alternative in commons: Augusto_Pinochet_-_1995.jpg (Augusto_Pinochet.jpg, Pinochet_y_Videla.jpg and Pinochet_y_Videla_2.jpg also show him in uniform but show him only incidentally), which I honestly believe to be of much inferior quality, both technically (it is overexposed, his face looks all funny and is plainly not well taken, and is of inferior resolution) and artistically (it is plain ugly, the colors are all wrong, etcetera), making it a non-valid free replacement. Of course, this is open to debate.

In addition to the above, this picture has a clear historical value, it is extremely famous in Chile and worldwide, and it has caused a lot of debate and controversies. It is probably the most famous and known photo of the Chilean dictatorship and of Pinochet, and given its historical value it is completely unique and representative of the repressive and iron-fisted nature of the Chilean dictatorship. As such, it has no replacement, either free or otherwise. Gorgonzola (talk) 23:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Commons has images which don't have license issues. Luis Napoles (talk) 05:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These images do NOT have license issues, and the images in commons are not suitable replacements. Gorgonzola (talk) 14:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This image is copyrighted and other noncopyrighted images are available, ergo, it is replaceable. Furthermore, the course needs more detail if it is to be kept. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pinochet portrait bw.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinochet portrait bw.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bukharin (notify | contribs).

Replaceable non-free image. Commons has free images. Therefore, the image falls under WP:CSD#F7. The uploader did not agree, and it was asked to be brought here after multiple re-uploads. hmwith τ 03:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I contest the deletion of the image under claims of WP:CSD#F7 both in form and substance. Disclaimer: i am the uploader.

In form: The file was speedy deleted two times, as it under WP:CSD#F7.1, but the deleting administrator is claiming that the deletion was motivated by WP:CSD#F7.2. The procedure for both causes differ, and User:hmwith resorted to the procedure specified for number 1 (inmediate deletion without notification) when he should have used the procedure established for number 2 (namely, tagging and notification for two days before deletion). I am the uploader and was not notified any of the times. I am not claiming that this was done in bad faith, as I understand that it is the nominator the one that should have notified me, but since there is a procedural vice in the previous deletions, i ask that this two previous deletions be not taken into consideration before making a decision on this nomination.

In substance: I dispute the claim that the file falls under WP:CSD#F7.1 (which was cited as the original reason for deletion), as the fair use rationale is not invalid per se: Chilean Law specifies that images of state officials in the exercise of their functions are free for use in educational contexts, even when the holder of property rigths over the image does not loose his rights in other contexts. Hence, even though the image does not enter the public domain (and is then in need of a fair use rationale) the use of the image in the context of WP is free, e.g. not requiring authorization. If attribution is needed is debatable (IANAL) but since the author is unknown to me (and i have exhausted the measures to identify him) this is not relevant.

I also dispute the more relevant question of whether the image is replaceable by a free alternative. Pinochet is, was, and always will be a military figure in the history of Chile. Presenting a photo of him in civilian suit is misleading, inconsistent with wikipedia use in other articles of similar figures, and plain wrong. He always wore military uniforms, even in his role as president of the republic. His official presidential portrait showed him in military uniform, his supporters usually prefer photos with military uniforms (see the galleries at www.fudacionpinochet.cl), etcetera. This leaves only one free alternative in commons: Augusto_Pinochet_-_1995.jpg (Augusto_Pinochet.jpg, Pinochet_y_Videla.jpg and Pinochet_y_Videla_2.jpg also show him in uniform but show him only incidentally), which I honestly believe to be of much inferior quality, both technically (it is overexposed, his face looks all funny and is plainly not well taken, and is of inferior resolution) and artistically (it is plain ugly, the colors are all wrong, etcetera), making it a non-valid free replacement. Of course, this is open to debate.Gorgonzola (talk) 23:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Commons has images which don't have license issues. Luis Napoles (talk) 05:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per #Pinochet_portrait_bw1.jpg — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

OCperfume.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wknight94 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:OCperfume.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rambo's Revenge (notify | contribs).

Replaceable non-free use image. Ejfetters (talk) 03:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Children at rodeo IMG 0328.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wknight94 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Children at rodeo IMG 0328.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy Hathorn (notify | contribs).

orphaned, low quality/blurred image Skier Dude (talk) 05:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Treasure.Island.Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wknight94 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Treasure.Island.Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stbalbach (notify | contribs).

WP:FAIR only allows fair use images where there is no free equivalent. It is patently obvious that Treasure Island (published 1882) has many free-use equivalents for a cover image, such as the Wyeth edition (America, 1911). Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 06:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteKeep I find it highly doubtful that anyone has a copy of the 1882 or 1911 editions - which would satisfy the 95 years old rule - laying around to be used as free alternatives. Therefore, you go with what you got. In this case, we've got a non-free 84 year old (1925) version. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 07:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Per JGHowes. Lesson learned. ;] - ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 17:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The rules don't make exceptions for that. Otherwise, the plague of modern Penguin-edition covers we had for a while would never have been cleared up (anyway, I'm actually trying to get a Wyeth, and if I do, it's all going up on Wiki. But that's not really the point.) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Criterion 1 for use of a non-free image here is that the image must not be replaceable by a free image or text which exists or could reasonably be created. If the last seven words were replaced by "which is immediately available", then Allstarecho's argument would hold water. But they aren't, and it doesn't. Stifle (talk) 09:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The 1911 edition cover is indeed at Commons (File:Treasure Island-Scribner's-1911.jpg), as a quick look at the Commons link shows. I've now replaced and orphaned this non-free image. JGHowes ^talk 16:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per JGHowes. Excellent find! — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Desperaux and Princess Pea.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Desperaux and Princess Pea.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Slgrandson (notify | contribs).

Image is merely being used to decorate the cast list. It is not illustrating anything in particular. The use of a non-free image is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 10:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep, with caveats I think it's at least somewhat justifiable to show the unusual graphic style of the film, if moved to the "Reception" section, where the graphic style is praised. That said, I wonder if it's actually the best image from the film to illustrate that. Thoughts? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 11:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. It is relevant in that the article mentions the animation style being the subject of critical praise. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 19:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I am inclined to delete because I do not believe it is easy to find critical commentary for a non-free image previously added for decorative purposes. Vice versa, it is easy; include commentary in the article, and if it helps to illustrate the commentary with a non-free image, do so. Here is a good article about the film's look as a starting point. —Erik (talk • contrib) 16:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep The commentary in the article listed by Erik shows there is potential for expansion. Furthermore, being able to identify the characters in the movie is appropriate for a cartoon. You can't replace this with pictures of actors at a press conference, for example. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2000 UCL Final.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 UCL Final.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by heusie18 (notify | contribs).

This image has now been made redundant by File:Real Madrid vs Valencia 2000-05-24.svg. – Pee Jay 11:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The Little Things Screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wknight94 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Little Things Screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sltchocum (notify | contribs).

Image is decorative; just a nondescript screenshot of the music video. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agreed. The album cover is ample - we don't need two more low-quality face shots, especially as one appears on the cover anyway. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 13:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per both of the above. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The Little Things U.K. Screenshot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wknight94 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Little Things U.K. Screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sltchocum (notify | contribs).

Image is decorative; just a nondescript screenshot of the music video. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agreed. The album cover is ample - we don't need two more low-quality face shots, especially as one appears on the cover anyway. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 13:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per #The_Little_Things_Screenshot.jpg — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:46, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SotoFreeImage4623.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Never mind Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 20:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SotoFreeImage4623.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Luigibob (notify | contribs).

Definitely a screen shot, which as far as I can tell can't be used to identify a person. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 18:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT? That's news to me! Did you read (1) the information on the person who took it (me) and/or (2) compare the vast number of other photos I've taken (specifically, see §10.4.1), uploaded and shared with a very light license. Seriously, the next time you decide to contribute over 500 photos to a project, see how you react with this sort of deletion nomination (without any notice, I should add --thankfully I had the file on my watchlist). Please withdraw this, now. --Bobak (talk) 19:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hulu App Store.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hulu App Store.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mattnad (notify | contribs).

I feel that this image fails WP:NFCC#3a as multiple non-free logos are being used unjustifiably, and it is more than incidental use. Stifle (talk) 18:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I note that the image has now been replaced in the one article where it was used. Stifle (talk) 13:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - As the editor who added the image, I'm fine with it being deleted. It's not vital to the article for which I intended it. It's part of the Plex App interface, but unconnected to the article, it's no longer viable under fair use in any case. Thanks. Mattnad (talk) 21:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom and uploader (don't say that very often...) — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bishkek logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bishkek logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bektour (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 20:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mediacorp central logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mediacorp central logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oahiyeel (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Logo intown suites.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo intown suites.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tatterfly (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Logo paristech.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo paristech.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Parisianseb (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Logo tyan 408x137.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo tyan 408x137.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chaostheorem (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Naftovyk Ukrnafta logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naftovyk Ukrnafta logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MaksKhomenko (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Onu logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onu logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Riurik (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Qualialogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qualialogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Potus1 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Quadrant standard logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quadrant standard logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Djbutt3rfly (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Qmc.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qmc.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ehrentitle (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Salinas Income copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salinas Income copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BrendelSignature (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

STERILE EO.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:STERILE EO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cp.7777 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

STERILE R.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:STERILE R.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cp.7777 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

STERILE STEAM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:STERILE STEAM.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cp.7777 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, supersded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SSBx LOGO ROUND.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SSBx LOGO ROUND.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Givechase (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BackstreetBoys AsLongAsYouLoveMe video.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BackstreetBoys AsLongAsYouLoveMe video.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aranherunar (notify | contribs).

File is of too low quality to provide any encyclopedic value, which is especially problematic for a non-free file. fuzzy510 (talk) 21:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Borderline Delete Showing images from a notable music video mentioned within its article is appropriate...but...this image is too fuzzy to show much of the quality/cinematography that made it notable. — BQZip01 — ^talk 03:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sfialogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sfialogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shaunlandry (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

CeBIT 15146.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CeBIT 15146.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moenni01 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

CeBIT Logistics.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CeBIT Logistics.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moenni01 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 21:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Blank RSC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blank RSC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rlsheehan (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not orphaned. Do not delete. Rlsheehan (talk) 02:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is orphaned, look at the File:Blank RSC.png, which is the one being used. Skier Dude (talk) 00:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bomb 0007th Wing B-36 Era.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bomb 0007th Wing B-36 Era.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by R. E. Mixer (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cache incoherence write.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cache incoherence write.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hmmmmike (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

CeBIT 14945.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CeBIT 14945.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moenni01 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

CeBIT 3658.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CeBIT 3658.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moenni01 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

CeBIT Turkey.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CeBIT Turkey.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moenni01 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Federal Prisoner Distribution.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Federal Prisoner Distribution.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mgotfredson (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

LTVN.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LTVN.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Legalnew (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Norfolk and Western Railway herald-1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norfolk and Western Railway herald-1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dp67 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. CSD I1 should allow redundant images in different formats such as this to be speedied. JGHowes ^talk 16:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

NyuTorch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NyuTorch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Isamuel (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MN02 109.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MN02 109.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rhelmerichs (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MN06 109.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MN06 109.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rhelmerichs (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mainolin.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mainolin.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Astuishin (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by ..png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MillerMed.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MillerMed.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by UMCane (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

NPS.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NPS.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xsmith (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 22:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Karachi at night.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karachi at night.JPEG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by M.Imran (notify | contribs).

karachi night, photo by: hammad in the given source world66.com looks different archive.org, world66.com doesn't seem to look after copyrights(?), size of the picture looks very like just taken from internet, uploader has several picture-copyvios on his discussion-page 172.158.45.125 (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete duplicate of an image already on commons. — BQZip01 — ^talk 03:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ringer t-shirt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ringer t-shirt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Herostratus (notify | contribs).

orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 23:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wpsaw.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpsaw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CyberGhostface (notify | contribs).

orphaned wikiproject image Skier Dude (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Image replaced by a PNG which is now used instead. This image is redundant and obsolete. -Gr0ff (talk) 14:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 April 15

April 15

zproxy.org